American Military Might

Present American forces and law enforcement agency power has been put to a test some(prenominal) internally and externally in new years. With the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, which was born, in large part, in response to the events of family line 11, resources for battling terrorism bedevil increased. Nevertheless, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq swallow shown that the unite States is not adequately fitted out(p) militarily to confront and defeat modern terrorist operations.While there has been a decrease interrorist acts occurring in the joined States, acts of terrorism foreign have not decreased. Clearly, the adequacy of legions planning and array prep aredness has been called into question. Douglas Bodero (1999) has determine four major theological basal areas. These four groupings are apocalyptic cults, sour Hebrew Israelism, the Christian Identity movements, and gaberdine supremacy religions. Doomsday cults believe that they must(prenomina l) take offensive action in order to bring about the arrest of the world (White2002). These beliefsform the basis and justification for the social occasion of violent methods which are ofttimes order at the United States. (T)errorist weapons are increasely sophisticated and deadly. (White 2002). Osama bin Laden excluded, news agencies in the United States have been extremely successful in locating and identifying terrorist group leaders. Unfortunately, the chastening to obtain intelligence from place East sources before terrorist acts occur has often been a challenge for the United States military and law enforcement agencies.This -1- is demonstrated by the failure to win battles in the Vietnam, Korean, and Iraq Wars. While the United States certainly has a tremendous military advantage with highly technological weapons, including nuclear weapons and satellite surveillance, access to nuclear weapons has no advantage unless the United States is willing to intake such weaponr y. Treaties with the United Nations have proscribe the use of nuclear weapons by any country. By doing, the United States has no faculty to use such military might.In the countries previously described, ground war tactics and irregular warfare have proved a match with American troops (White2002). The unpopularity of the military draft, which originated in the Vietnam era, has prevented the United States from building capable troops needed in flake terrorism and state-sponsored terrorism. Clearly, the United States simply has light troops to battle terrorism occurring abroad. An increasing trend comes in the form of state-sponsored terrorism. Libya, Syria,and Iran are but some of the many countries which pay and provide weaponry and safe havens to terrorist groups. In the past, terrorist training camps located in Afghanistan have assisted in training draw a bead on terrorists from all over the world, including the Palestinian outlet Organization (PLO) (White2002). In order to fuck off a dent in preventing terrorism, the United States must recognize that a constitution which publicly states that We will not manage with terrorists is often an impossibility. Certainly, the British initially believed that scamp colonies in the AmericanRevolution were terrorists and Britain used that policy to no avail. The policy which is advanced herein ignores prefatorial crisis negotiation tactics. Just as legal philosophy must negotiate with -2- kidnappers and hostages to prevent damage to citizens, it is asserted here that the major conflicts could be mitigated and prevented (to some extent), with a polar ideology in dealing with the terrorists and terrorist groups composite in the Iraq Civil war. CITATION White, J. (2002). terrorism An Introduction (4th Ed. ). BelmontCA Wadsworth. -3-